#LEAP Manifesto Advocates Should be Held to Same Standard of Accountability on Science and Feasibility as those they Critique Says Friends of Science

“Carbon dioxide is not a control knob that can fine tune climate” – Judith Curry, Atmospheric Scientist, Georgia Tech

#LEAP Manifesto advocates should be held to the same standard of accountability on climate change science, and on the technical feasibility of their proposals as the corporate system they critique

#LEAP Manifesto advocates should be held to the same standard of accountability on climate change science, and on the technical feasibility of their proposals as the corporate system they critique, says Friends of Science, responding to an article in the National Observer of June 27, 2017 on Naomi Klein and her new book “No is Not Enough.”

In the National Observer article, Naomi Klein, co-author of #LEAP, claims people should push Prime Minister Trudeau to stick to climate change policies; indeed the #LEAP Manifesto calls for complete stoppage of fossil fuel use and infrastructure. Friends of Science says that’s irresponsible as society would completely collapse within days, as explained by scientist Blair King in his blog Aug. 3, 2016, “A Thought Experiment about a World without Fossil Fuels.”

The #LEAP Manifesto claims fossil fuels are subsidized in Canada – Friends of Science report “Keep Canada in the Black” shows that Canada’s entire economy is underwritten by oil and gas production and export.

Friends of Science developed the #Look Manifesto as in #LookB4ULeap to counter the dangerous ideology over evidence found in #LEAP. LINK: lookb4uleap.tumblr.com/

#LEAPers like Klein push for renewables; David Suzuki is a LEAP signatory. Friends of Science is critical of David Suzuki Fund’s lack of due diligence on renewable claims.

However, as Robert Lyman writes in a blog…

Read the full article from the Source…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *